GoldMoney
guarantees:
Absolute ownership, THIS IS NOT PAPER GOLD.
You, not GoldMoney, are the absolute owner of your gold and silver. GoldMoney
stores it securely on your behalf.
When you purchase precious metals through your GoldMoney account, you actually
hold and own the metal in your name. GoldMoney is not a "paper gold" product,
which means that your gold ownership is not dependent upon an exchange traded
fund's (ETF's), certificate issuer's or pool account operator's ability to
obtain and redeem metal for you when you want to sell it.
Nearly all of these types of "paper metal" programs work on a fractional reserve
basis, so if the majority of the program's customer wanted to redeem their metal
for cash, the program operator would not be able to meet all of its obligations.
In other words, "paper metal" products represent merely a promise to pay metal;
they are not products that give you direct ownership of metal, and therefore
expose you to counterparty risk since you are dependent upon the program
issuer's ability to meet all of its obligations.
Contrary to the fractional reserve nature of "paper metal" programs, the
quantity of customer metals recorded in GoldMoney's database is always equal to
the quantity of metals in the vaults.
GoldMoney guarantees it.
OPEN YOUR FREE GOLDMONEY
ACCOUNT TODAY.

- GOLD NEWS Another Great Depression
I don’t like to start any new year on a gloomy note. I am by nature an optimist,
but I am also a realist who readily faces facts. Right now those facts are not
very pretty and suggest to me that the world has entered into another Great
Depression. Here are some shockers about the US economy that are worth
pondering.
The National Bureau of Economic Research reckons that the present recession
began in December 2007. In only one month since then has the US economy not lost
jobs, but worryingly, the job losses are occurring with increasing momentum
suggesting that the economy is spiraling downward.
Last week the US government announced that the unemployment rate rose this past
December to 7.2% from 6.8% the month before. The US economy lost 2.6 million
jobs in 2008, of which 1.9 million were lost in the past four months. Of these,
524,000 were lost in December alone.
Importantly, there are clear indications that employment will drop further.
Companies have been cutting back on hours worked, which reached a record low in
December of 33.3 hours per week. This measure is a leading indicator because
companies first cut back on hours worked before they cut jobs. Also, layoffs are
growing. The Wall Street Journal reports: “The new year has brought no letup on
layoffs, as employers have already announced more than 30,000 cuts.”
The monthly unemployment report is prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics
<http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm>. It reveals that the number of
unemployed has climbed over the past year by 3.6 million to 11.1 million, but
the real numbers are much worse when looking through the government
sugar-coating in these reports. As The Wall Street Journal explains it: “While
the official unemployment rate is 7.2%, a different figure that includes
discouraged workers who have dropped out of the labor force and those working
part-time because they can't find full-time work hit 13.5% in December. That was
nearly a full percentage point higher than in the previous month and up from
8.7% at the end of 2007.”
While a 13.5% unemployment rate is shocking, the truth is even worse because the
WSJ is still relying upon government reports. To get the unadorned picture, we
need to turn to private economists, and I reply upon the work of John Williams
of Shadow Government Statistics <http://www.shadowstats.com/>, who presents in
his latest report the true picture of the dire unemployment situation: “During
the Clinton Administration, ‘discouraged workers’ those had given up looking for
a job because there were no jobs to be had were redefined so as to be counted
only if they had been ‘discouraged’ for less than a year. This time
qualification defined away the bulk of the discouraged workers. Adding them back
into the total unemployed, actual unemployment, as estimated by the SGS-Alternate
Unemployment Measure, rose to 17.5% in December from 16.6% in November.”
Unemployment is the key measure that signals whether or not a depression has
begun, and by the SGS measures we are rapidly approaching the 25% unemployment
rate usually mentioned as the most important signpost marking the depths of the
Great Depression. That high rate of unemployment cut a wide-swath of misery
through the American population.
Given the current 17.5% rate of unemployment, it would appear that I am not far
off the mark to suggest that we have entered another Great Depression, and I am
not alone in my thinking. Others who are more attuned to the economic situation
see it the same way as I do.
For example, the following quote is from an OpEd piece by Nobel Laureate Paul
Krugman that was published in The New York Times on January 5th: “The fact is
that recent economic numbers have been terrifying, not just in the United States
but around the world. Manufacturing, in particular, is plunging everywhere.
Banks aren’t lending; businesses and consumers aren’t spending. Let’s not mince
words: This looks an awful lot like the beginning of a second Great Depression.”
I agree, which is unusual because I don’t often agree with Mr. Krugman. But not
only do I think his observation about another Great Depression is accurate, but
I also agree with another key point of the analysis in his article.
Namely, Mr. Krugman observes: “In 2003, Robert Lucas of the University of
Chicago, in his presidential address to the American Economic Association,
declared that the central problem of depression-prevention has been solved, for
all practical purposes, and has in fact been solved for many decades. Milton
Friedman, in particular, persuaded many economists that the Federal Reserve
could have stopped the Depression in its tracks simply by providing banks with
more liquidity, which would have prevented a sharp fall in the money supply...It
turns out, however, that preventing depressions isn’t that easy after all.”
Not only is it not “easy”, it is impossible, and the reason is simple. Ludwig
von Mises explained this phenomenon in 1912 in his seminal work, “The Theory of
Money and Credit”.
Basically, banks make too many loans creating a ‘boom’ that is built upon an
unsustainable and shaky foundation of credit. Eventually, the bankers and their
borrowers realize that these extensions of credit and the mountain of borrowing
that resulted from it was imprudent, and they then seek to improve the dire
state of their overleveraged balance sheets. The ‘bust’ occurs because the loans
made during good times inevitably lead to bad investment decisions that appear
sound only within the illusory prosperity of the boom.
In short, prosperity comes from hard work and savings, not borrowed money and
consumption. Unfortunately, hard work and savings have been in short supply, and
economies around the world are now feeling the consequences.
For decades the global economy in general and the US economy in particular have
enjoyed the boom. They are now in the throws of the bust, and this where Mr.
Krugman and I part company. He believes that this current bust can be avoided by
more of the same – government spending.
He says: “Friedman’s claim that monetary policy could have prevented the Great
Depression was an attempt to refute the analysis of John Maynard Keynes, who
argued that monetary policy is ineffective under depression conditions and that
fiscal policy – large-scale deficit spending by the government – is needed to
fight mass unemployment. The failure of monetary policy in the current crisis
shows that Keynes had it right the first time. And Keynesian thinking lies
behind Mr. Obama’s plans to rescue the economy.”
This wrong-headed thinking is what put the US economy – and indeed, the global
economy – in this mess in the first place. Therefore, the cure cannot possibly
come from government spending, all of which is going to come from debt – some $2
trillion of it that is estimated the government will borrow this current fiscal
year.
If Mr. Obama follows this advice – and he has clearly indicated that he will –
the US government will have gone ‘to the well’ once too often. It is foolhardy
to think that the federal government’s resources and borrowing capacity are
unlimited. They are not, and more to the point, they have already been exceeded.
It’s just that too few people today recognize this reality, which is what always
happens in bubbles. People accept certain conventional wisdoms without question
or even any cursory analysis. For example, consider the following.
Circa 2000 – It doesn’t matter that Internet stocks are trading at multiples of
revenue because ‘these companies are going to change the way we do business’.
Circa 2005 – It doesn’t matter that people are borrowing 125% of the home
purchase price because ‘the price of homes always goes up’.
Circa 2009 – US government ‘T-bills and T-bonds are risk free’, so the federal
government can borrow unlimited amounts of money. This example of
bubble-mentality thinking not only ignores the defaults by countless
governments, it also ignores the history of US sovereign defaults (gold in 1933
and silver in 1967) as well as the continuing debasement of the sorry US dollar
from inflation.
It is questionable whether Keynesian dogma ever worked, but regardless, one
thing is clear. Increased borrowing and spending by an overleveraged government
in an overleveraged country that is already the world’s largest debtor will not
make the economy strong or lead to an economic revival. It will lead to a
collapse of the currency, just like it has done in dozens of countries
throughout the world. By pursuing defunct Keynesian dogma the new administration
is ringing the bell that signals the death knell of the dollar.
In short, the biggest bubble of them all – that the US dollar is ‘money’ – is
about to pop. The US dollar is on the path to the fiat currency graveyard, and
will soon get there.
Not only does the US have problems, but like the 1930s, they are global. While
it had been hoped that China would be the shock-absorber of the world, both its
exports and imports are falling from year-ago levels as its manufacturing
activity stalls. Germany is also faltering, as is much of Europe. There is
another similarity to the 1930s.
Most people mark the beginning of the Great Depression with the stock market
crash in October 1929. I think it actually began over a year later with the
collapse of the Bank of the United States in December 1930, a commercial bank
based in New York City. Its failure turned an economic downturn into a
full-fledged panic that rocked the American banking system to its core, which in
turn sent ripple effects throughout the world, just like the collapse of Lehman
has done.
Is there some good news for 2009? There are two things that should bring some
cheer.
First, the plummeting price of crude oil to $40 a barrel has put some $200
billion back into the pockets of Americans. That may help economic activity
somewhat or at the very least, help repair household balance sheets.
Second, gold is likely to have another good year as the world increasingly wakes
up to today’s realities. As they do, they will also come to understand that gold
is money, which is a good thing to hold any time, but particularly during
economic and monetary turmoil.
by James Turk

GoldMoney -
Gold -
All articles
on this website are result of personal researches. This is not financial advice
and you should not consider it as such. All investments involve risk and you
should always consult your financial advisor before placing yourself in a
position of risk. While best efforts have been made in preparing these articles,
you should always validate and research the facts yourself. |